Re: [RFC] [Discussion] Class Naming
| From: | Fleshgrinder | Date: | Sat, 03 Jun 2017 13:52:47 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: [RFC] [Discussion] Class Naming | ||
| References: | 1 2 | Groups: | php.internals |
| Request: | Send a blank email to internals+get-99340@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
On 6/3/2017 3:20 PM, Dan Ackroyd wrote:
> On 3 June 2017 at 13:03, Fleshgrinder <php@fleshgrinder.com> wrote:
>> https://wiki.php.net/rfc/class-naming
>
> For the RFC to be precise, it probably needs to specify the rules for
> initialisations explicitly.
>
> Presumably the same as acronyms?
>
> cheers
> Dan
>
Thanks, I updated the RFC and PRs accordingly. Acronyms and initialisms
are basically the same thing, the differentiation is only important for
spoken language. Still good to cover right away, so very good catch!
I also added a special case with Radar to the examples. Some acronyms
are not all-upper in their standard notation, hence, they should't be in
our code.
--
Richard "Fleshgrinder" Fussenegger
Attachment: [application/pgp-signature] OpenPGP digital signature signature.asc
Attachment: [application/pgp-signature] OpenPGP digital signature signature.asc