Re: [RFC] [Discussion] Class Naming
| From: | Fleshgrinder | Date: | Sat, 10 Jun 2017 20:57:11 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: [RFC] [Discussion] Class Naming | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 | Groups: | php.internals |
| Request: | Send a blank email to internals+get-99485@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
On 6/10/2017 10:54 PM, Niklas Keller wrote:
> The minimum discussion period is two weeks.
>
> Regards, Niklas
Not according to our rules, no:
> There'd be a minimum of 2 weeks between when an RFC that touches the
> language is brought up on this list and when it's voted on is
> required. Other RFCs might use a smaller timeframe, but it should be
> at least a week.
>
> --- https://wiki.php.net/rfc/voting#discussion_period
This RFC is only about a tiny extension of the coding standards, no
other change to PHP is proposed. Hence, one week seems sensible. We can
of course wait if there is a serious issue.
--
Richard "Fleshgrinder" Fussenegger
Attachment: [application/pgp-signature] OpenPGP digital signature signature.asc
Attachment: [application/pgp-signature] OpenPGP digital signature signature.asc