Re: [RFC] [Discussion] Class Naming

From: Date: Sat, 03 Jun 2017 14:07:03 +0000
Subject: Re: [RFC] [Discussion] Class Naming
References: 1  Groups: php.internals 
Request: Send a blank email to internals+get-99342@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message
On 3 June 2017 13:03:20 BST, Fleshgrinder <php@fleshgrinder.com> wrote: >As previously announced, I would like to set an end to these >discussions >in the community: > >https://wiki.php.net/rfc/class-naming Hi Richard, I think 3-way votes are potentially confusing, and saying it's a "simple 50%+1 majority vote" doesn't really make sense if it's not a yes/no question. What if the vote splits 49/48/3? Does "do nothing" win because the other options didn't pass the winning post, even though some people would actually be happy with either option? I don't think there are many people who would rank the options as A > neither > B in this case. Perhaps it would be better to separate the vote in two: - Should coding standard be changed? Yes / No, 50%+1 required for change - Which style should be used if change is accepted? A / B, highest total wins regardless of proportion. Regards, -- Rowan Collins [IMSoP]

« previous php.internals (#99342) next »