Re: [RFC] [Discussion] Class Naming
| From: | Rowan Collins | Date: | Sat, 03 Jun 2017 14:07:03 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: [RFC] [Discussion] Class Naming | ||
| References: | 1 | Groups: | php.internals |
| Request: | Send a blank email to internals+get-99342@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
On 3 June 2017 13:03:20 BST, Fleshgrinder <php@fleshgrinder.com> wrote:
>As previously announced, I would like to set an end to these
>discussions
>in the community:
>
>https://wiki.php.net/rfc/class-naming
Hi Richard,
I think 3-way votes are potentially confusing, and saying it's a "simple 50%+1 majority
vote" doesn't really make sense if it's not a yes/no question.
What if the vote splits 49/48/3? Does "do nothing" win because the other options
didn't pass the winning post, even though some people would actually be happy with either
option? I don't think there are many people who would rank the options as A > neither > B
in this case.
Perhaps it would be better to separate the vote in two:
- Should coding standard be changed? Yes / No, 50%+1 required for change
- Which style should be used if change is accepted? A / B, highest total wins regardless of
proportion.
Regards,
--
Rowan Collins
[IMSoP]