Re: [RFC] [Discussion] Class Naming

On 6/3/2017 4:07 PM, Rowan Collins wrote: > Hi Richard, > > I think 3-way votes are potentially confusing, and saying it's a > "simple 50%+1 majority vote" doesn't really make sense if it's not a > yes/no question. > > What if the vote splits 49/48/3? Does "do nothing" win because the > other options didn't pass the winning post, even though some people > would actually be happy with either option? I don't think there are > many people who would rank the options as A > neither > B in this > case. > > Perhaps it would be better to separate the vote in two: - Should > coding standard be changed? Yes / No, 50%+1 required for change - > Which style should be used if change is accepted? A / B, highest > total wins regardless of proportion. > > Regards, > You are completely right, this makes no sense as it stands. Changed to how you propose it, as it is the only thing that actually makes sense. ;) -- Richard "Fleshgrinder" Fussenegger

Attachment: [application/pgp-signature] OpenPGP digital signature signature.asc