Re: Changed goals
| From: | Martin Jansen | Date: | Wed, 26 Feb 2003 13:51:37 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: Changed goals | ||
| References: | 1 2 | Groups: | php.pear.dev |
| Request: | Send a blank email to pear-dev+get-13918@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
On Wed Feb 26, 2003 at 02:1729PM +0100, Pierre-Alain Joye wrote:
> On Tue, 25 Feb 2003 15:46:33 +0100
> LIMBOURG Arnaud <arnaud.limbourg@cegetel.fr> wrote:
>
> > > To make that clear:
> > > I thought PEAR wants to be an ressource of high quality code for
> > > specific problems. You want to do something and first of all you
> > > take a look at _THE_ PEAR class, which does this thing, cause you
> > > can be sure about CS and quality. Having 1000 classes in PEAR is
> > > much worse than having 30 good classes IMHO. OK. Having 2 classes
> > > with really diffrent approach matching diffrent real life needs
> > > makes sense.
> >
> > PFC are just the 30 good classes you speak about.
>
> And the rest is a kind of hotscript/CPAN with thousands of modules and
> many equivalent modules ?
Of course not. Even with the PFC, PEAR has to retain the current rules
for *all* the code and IMO they shouldn't be made less strict.
--
- Martin Martin Jansen
http://martinjansen.com/