RE: [PEAR-DEV] PEAR Meeting topics
| From: | Lukas Smith | Date: | Tue, 01 Apr 2003 13:14:46 +0000 |
| Subject: | RE: [PEAR-DEV] PEAR Meeting topics | ||
| References: | 1 | Groups: | php.pear.dev |
| Request: | Send a blank email to pear-dev+get-14755@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
> From: Martin Jansen [mailto:mj@php.net]
> Sent: Tuesday, April 01, 2003 3:10 PM
> To: jeroen@terena.nl
> Cc: PEAR Developers Mailing List
> Subject: Re: [PEAR-DEV] PEAR Meeting topics
>
> On Tue, 2003-04-01 at 14:28, Jeroen Houben wrote:
> > I'd like to suggest we give each topic an importance rating and
discuss
> > the most important topics first and work down to the less important
> ones.
>
> So here's my suggestion:
>
> 1.: PFC
> 2.: Quality vs. Quantity
> 3.: Documentation RfC
> 4.: Possible regulations for conflicts
> 5.: The package voting system on pear.php.net
> 6.: PEAR on Windows
> 7.: misc.
Sounds good.
I would switch 1. and 2. because 2. is vital in determining what our
goals are and will therefore affect all future discussions.
misc: would be stuff like naming conventions for methods.
By the time of the meeting 6. might have become misc because the major
issues may already be resolved. Lets hope :-)
Regards,
Lukas