Re: voting
| From: | Stig S. Bakken | Date: | Fri, 11 Apr 2003 23:37:19 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: voting | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 4 | Groups: | php.pear.dev |
| Request: | Send a blank email to pear-dev+get-15126@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
On Wed, 2003-04-02 at 16:22, Martin Jansen wrote:
> On Wed, 2003-04-02 at 15:56, Leandro Lucarella wrote:
> > Martin Jansen, el miércoles 2 de abril a las 10:08 me escribiste:
> > > On Wed, 2003-04-02 at 09:57, Robin Ericsson wrote:
> > > > Is really everyone entitled to vote? If so, that sounds like a bad idea.
> > > >
> > > > Shouldn't only the votes from the "core pear people" count?
> > >
> > > For the upcoming voting system on pear.php.net, which I'm building
> > > currently, I've planned the following system:
> > >
> > > Generally everybody can vote, but every proposal needs to at least get
> > > five positive votes from people having a pear.php.net account.
> >
> > So, really, the votes of other people are just cosmetic...
>
> In my current plan, the votes of the users can be seen as an animation
> for PEAR developers: When developers see, that people really like to
> have this package in PEAR (=> a lot of user votes), they can give a
> positive vote even if they have no real opinion themselves.
If you feel adventurous, why not copy a certification scheme like
Advogato's, and determine a "voting authority" for each maintainer?
Probably a bit of work, but if someone thinks it sounds interesting...
- Stig