RE: [PEAR-DEV] PEAR::Date

From: Date: Wed, 21 May 2003 17:46:42 +0000
Subject: RE: [PEAR-DEV] PEAR::Date
References: 1  Groups: php.pear.dev 
Request: Send a blank email to pear-dev+get-16593@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message
"to having a new additional maintainer for PEAR::Date." +1 : Last release in Oct 2002 seems a long time... Current stable version 1.3 contains a bug on the constructor: $DOB=new Date('1969-08-12'); // returns January 1 1970 00:00:00 (start of Unix Epoch time) I have sent a proposed fix to Baba a few months ago, but still waiting for a release. I have been working on a modified version of PEAR::Date which I have added some useful features (that do not restrict to Epoch time): $tDiff = Date::Diff($Date1, $Date2, $timeUnitType='s'); $Date2 = Date::Add($Date1, $timeUnit, $timeUnitType='s'); $myAge = Date::getAge($DOB=false); Is there anyone working on a similar methods above? If not, I wish to submit an update of my code to PEAR. Also, I wish to propose the current format() method to support the similar format characters as the core PHP Date() function. My best regards, Joe Lee, joelee@joeworks.com -----Original Message----- From: Lukas Smith [mailto:smith@backendmedia.com] Sent: Wednesday, May 21, 2003 4:04 PM To: pear-dev@lists.php.net Subject: [PEAR-DEV] PEAR::Date Hi, I know we have had this before but we seriously need a new addtionak maintainer for PEAR::Date. Therefore I propose: 1) vote on if we will infact add a new additional maintainer 2) if yes people can step up to take the position and we will then quickly vote on who will become the new maintainer. Since we don't have a formal voting system in place I suggest we just start the voting and hopefully things are obvious enough that we don't need a lengthy debate as to how many votes of what type are required... Anyways +1 from me to having a new additional maintainer for PEAR::Date. Regards, Lukas Smith smith@backendmedia.com

« previous php.pear.dev (#16593) next »