Re: package proposal: HTTP_SimpleClient

On Thu, 05 Jun 2003 12:58:38 +0400 Alexey Borzov <borz_off@cs.msu.su> wrote: > OK, looks that I have 5 +1's, but you and Pierre-Alain do not like the > > 'SimpleClient' name. > > I suggested such a name to highlight the fact that the class itself > does not have any complex processing logic, that such logic should be > added by the user. I do not have any objections to HTTP::Client name > other that it sounds too generic for my taste. The name should reflect the goal of the package. Yes it uses a simple logic, but in fact this is a http client, which is basically simple. Do you plan to add features to it? I'll not like to see again hundreds of HTTP packages for the same usage. We have now 2 packages with 2 different goals. HTTP_Request is a low level request package, and yours is a kind of high level package. Do we need many others HTTP clients packages in PEAR? I do not think, imho. hth pierre