Re: package proposal: HTTP_SimpleClient

+1 for HTTP_Client > Alexey Borzov wrote: > > Hi! > > > > Jesus M. Castagnetto wrote: > > > >> +1 on the proposal, tho' the name of HTTP_Client would be enough IMHO > >> > >> Code looks good on a cursory look-over. > > > > > > OK, looks that I have 5 +1's, but you and Pierre-Alain do not like the > > 'SimpleClient' name. > > > > I suggested such a name to highlight the fact that the class itself does > > not have any complex processing logic, that such logic should be added > > by the user. I do not have any objections to HTTP::Client name other > > that it sounds too generic for my taste. > > +1 for HTTP_Client > > > -- > Wolfram > > ... opensource @ vision:produktion ... > http://opensource.visionp.de > > ... translating template engine .... > http://sf.net/projects/simpletpl > > ... authentication system .... > http://sf.net/projects/auth > > > -- > PEAR Development Mailing List (http://pear.php.net/) > To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php > >