Re: package proposal: HTTP_SimpleClient
| From: | Tomas V.V.Cox | Date: | Thu, 05 Jun 2003 12:06:59 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: package proposal: HTTP_SimpleClient | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 | Groups: | php.pear.dev |
| Request: | Send a blank email to pear-dev+get-17052@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
Next level is HTTP_Browser ;)
Tomas V.V.Cox
----- Original Message -----
From: "Pierre-Alain Joye" <paj@pearfr.org>
To: "Alexey Borzov" <borz_off@cs.msu.su>
Cc: <jcastagnetto@yahoo.com>; <pear-dev@lists.php.net>
Sent: Thursday, June 05, 2003 11:09 AM
Subject: Re: [PEAR-DEV] package proposal: HTTP_SimpleClient
> On Thu, 05 Jun 2003 12:58:38 +0400
> Alexey Borzov <borz_off@cs.msu.su> wrote:
>
> > OK, looks that I have 5 +1's, but you and Pierre-Alain do not like the
> >
> > 'SimpleClient' name.
> >
> > I suggested such a name to highlight the fact that the class itself
> > does not have any complex processing logic, that such logic should be
> > added by the user. I do not have any objections to HTTP::Client name
> > other that it sounds too generic for my taste.
>
> The name should reflect the goal of the package. Yes it uses a simple
> logic, but in fact this is a http client, which is basically simple.
>
> Do you plan to add features to it? I'll not like to see again hundreds
> of HTTP packages for the same usage. We have now 2 packages with 2
> different goals. HTTP_Request is a low level request package, and yours
> is a kind of high level package. Do we need many others HTTP clients
> packages in PEAR? I do not think, imho.
>
> hth
>
> pierre
>
> --
> PEAR Development Mailing List (http://pear.php.net/)
> To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
>
>