Re: package proposal: HTTP_SimpleClient
| From: | Alexey Borzov | Date: | Thu, 05 Jun 2003 08:58:38 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: package proposal: HTTP_SimpleClient | ||
| References: | 1 | Groups: | php.pear.dev |
| Request: | Send a blank email to pear-dev+get-17046@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
Hi!
Jesus M. Castagnetto wrote:
+1 on the proposal, tho' the name of HTTP_Client would be enough IMHO Code looks good on a cursory look-over.OK, looks that I have 5 +1's, but you and Pierre-Alain do not like the 'SimpleClient' name. I suggested such a name to highlight the fact that the class itself does not have any complex processing logic, that such logic should be added by the user. I do not have any objections to HTTP::Client name other that it sounds too generic for my taste.