Re: Mail_Box RFC (?)
| From: | Jan Schneider | Date: | Tue, 15 Jul 2003 21:14:59 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: Mail_Box RFC (?) | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 4 | Groups: | php.pear.dev |
| Request: | Send a blank email to pear-dev+get-18275@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
Zitat von "Damian Fernandez Sosa (DESC)" <damlists@cnba.uba.ar>:
> Since Net_IMAP 0.5 the Auth code is loaded only if needed. if your IMAP
> server
> supports CRAM-MD5 or DIGEST-MD5.
That's A Good Thing.
> What do you think about splitting IMAPProtocol.php and IMAP.php in
> several
> files to load only the extensions that the IMAP server supports? (and the
> extension is loaded only if the user calls it)
Sounds good.
> so you can have a full featured IMAP Implementation but you don't have to
> load a
> 120kb class
>
>
> So if tou implement a class Net_cyrus class based on Net_IMAP, Net_IMAP
> don't
> load all its functionality, only Quota, ACL and Folder Stuff.
I'm already convinced by you that it probably doesn't make sense anymore to
do a separate Net_Cyrus class, but we'll see.
> Jan Schneider: If you like my aproach (auto-loading functionality) please
> I like
> - if you want - to work together to define what components sould be
> splited
> and loaded on demand.
I really like to but am very busy at work atm, so I won't find the time to
layout an api set for the different classes and wrappers or to comment more
detailed on Wolfram's proposal. Perhaps I'll find some time next month.
Jan.
--
http://www.horde.org - The Horde Project
http://www.ammma.de - discover your knowledge
http://www.tip4all.de - Deine private Tippgemeinschaft