Re: Mail_Box RFC (?)

Alan Knowles wrote:

Looks Ok, although a bit over heavy on accessors where having public vars may suffice.

since the classes are also meant for manipulation of the Mail_* stuff i think that accessors are the better choice, since the accessing of properties can cause a lot of problems ... any more opinions?

I see you are running into the same problem I do.. - not enought hours in the day to maintain more than 5 or so official pear packages.. :)

yep :-)

Regards Alan LIMBOURG Arnaud wrote:

to keep it going ... i am still in the need of the Mail_* packages and i have put my next steps online * Mail_Box package

    http://opensource.visionp.biz/Mail_Box.121.0.html

* Mail_Message package

    http://opensource.visionp.biz/Mail_Message.120.0.html

is this something that needs pear needs? (+1/-1) is someone interested in taking over the maintainership in case it makes it into pear? Is the concept/structure as i propose it suiteable for the mass?

It looks good, +1. Arnaud.

Regards Wolfram ... opensource @ vision:produktion ... http://opensource.visionp.de ... authentication system .... http://sf.net/projects/auth