Re: AW: [PEAR-DEV] Package Proposal: XML_WDDX

From: Date: Tue, 05 Aug 2003 07:41:47 +0000
Subject: Re: AW: [PEAR-DEV] Package Proposal: XML_WDDX
References: 1  Groups: php.pear.dev 
Request: Send a blank email to pear-dev+get-19274@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message
It would be nice to get HTTP_Session into CVS... as it doesnt have documentation and source code is only available after installing it... Wrapping C functions in Classes, just to provide an Object Interface is not always a good idea (as it adds quite alot of overhead, both in terms of runtime speed, and extra documentation), unless they add real value.. I guess I didnt see that much 'added value' in the wrapper, that could justify it.... But that just my opinion :) Regards Alan Stephan Schmidt wrote:
Hi,
Most of this should really go in the C source, The C code is pretty simple for this extension..
Does that mean you'd like to add OO support to the C code? I don't think that this is a good idea. I'd like an approach like the HTTP_Session class, which is wrapped around the session_* functions, so they can be used with an object instead of funtions. I do not want to change any C code... Stephan
-- Can you help out? Need Consulting Services or Know of a Job? http://www.akbkhome.com

« previous php.pear.dev (#19274) next »