Re: AW: [PEAR-DEV] Package Proposal: XML_WDDX
| From: | Alan Knowles | Date: | Tue, 05 Aug 2003 07:41:47 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: AW: [PEAR-DEV] Package Proposal: XML_WDDX | ||
| References: | 1 | Groups: | php.pear.dev |
| Request: | Send a blank email to pear-dev+get-19274@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
It would be nice to get HTTP_Session into CVS... as it doesnt have documentation and source code is only available after installing it...
Wrapping C functions in Classes, just to provide an Object Interface is not always a good idea (as it adds quite alot of overhead, both in terms of runtime speed, and extra documentation), unless they add real value..
I guess I didnt see that much 'added value' in the wrapper, that could justify it....
But that just my opinion :)
Regards
Alan
Stephan Schmidt wrote:
Hi,-- Can you help out? Need Consulting Services or Know of a Job? http://www.akbkhome.comMost of this should really go in the C source, The C code is pretty simple for this extension..Does that mean you'd like to add OO support to the C code? I don't think that this is a good idea. I'd like an approach like the HTTP_Session class, which is wrapped around the session_* functions, so they can be used with an object instead of funtions. I do not want to change any C code... Stephan