Re: Package Proposal: HTML_Template_Dummy

On Fri Jul 18, 2003 at 03:3219PM -0500, Paul M Jones wrote: > On Friday, Jul 18, 2003, at 15:25 US/Central, Martin Jansen wrote: > > >On Fri Jul 18, 2003 at 01:5547PM -0500, Paul M Jones wrote: > >>Yes, I'm serious; no, the name is not a joke (well, the name is an > >>obvious reference to Smarty ;-). This is a template class for those > >>of > >>us that think it is perhaps a misguided effort to learn a new > >>templating language just so we can separate business logic from > >>display > >>logic. > >> > >> http://www.phppatterns.com/index.php/article/articleview/4/1/1/]ï > >> #ìK(®OQÒDkü# > >> > >> http://www.massassi.com/php/articles/template_engines/ > > > >Yikes! Do we really need yet another template engine? I doubt so. > > Probably not, and I submitted knowing that would be the first response > in everybody's mind. It'd be my first response. However, I think > Dummy may warrant a quick look (five minutes, no more) to see if it > fits a need. It does for me, and I figured it might for others. See > my comments with Lukas, earlier. No biggie either way. There indeed may be a need for this package for some people. However I think that we already have too much template engines in PEAR. Adding more just makes things worse. => -1 -- - Martin Martin Jansen http://martinjansen.com/