Re: sources for PEAR_PackageFileManager

what about the license tag problems? On Tue, 2003-07-22 at 19:14, Greg Beaver wrote: > Hi, > > I use the PEAR_Common->infoFromString() to extract the file contents, > and it removes the DOCTYPE completely. Should I open a bug on this, > Martin, or is there a way to preserve it when using > PEAR_Common->xmlFromInfo()? > > Greg > > Mirco 'Meebey' Bauer wrote: > > I found another little thing beside this license tag problems. > > The added DOCTYPE line from mj is also removed.... > > > > On Tue, 2003-07-22 at 15:39, Mirco 'meebey' Bauer wrote: > > > >>Greg this is absolutly the best PEAR package I ever used :)) > >>great job! > >> > >>But I found 3 strange behaviors: > >>license in the option array is not fully used, > >>1. in the current release the license tag is not touched at all, so if > >>there is a license tag is will be the same value whatever it was. > >>2. the license tag is always removed from package scope, I had the > >>license tag after the package description, its gone. > >>3. in the changelog section the license tag is removed from an older > >>release, but the license tag _is_ written for the new changelog. > >> > >>so far I could only find problems with the license tag, everything else > >>worked fine, except some cosmetic things (wrapping the XML tags > >>around...) > >> > >>Mirco > > > > -- Mirco 'meebey' Bauer PGP-Key: http://search.keyserver.net:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x5051C9B9 -----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK----- Version: 3.12 GIT d s-: a--- C++ UL++>++++ P L++$>+++$ E W+++$ N o? K- w++>! O- M- V? PS PE+ Y- PGP>++ t 5+ X++ R tv+ b+ DI? D+ G>++ e h! r>++ y? ------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------