Re: Third Party (Non-Official) PEAR Packages?

I c, but how dow you want to avoid that functionality of third party-software is allready defined in some other (primary) package - or is gonna to be implemented as such afterwards? I see a problem in keeping the balance - I think third party products should be added to the primary package as soon as there will be a need for the individual functionality this unofficial releases supply. Am I wrong if I fear that people won't use the primary packages (those for which PEAR was designed) - and instead keep downloading those unsupported packages? Would PEAR become another "HotScripts"-Project? Regards Thorsten