Re: Re[6]: [PEAR-DEV] previos message

On Sun, 16 Sep 2001 03:08:43 +0400, Denis Peplin wrote: >Thank you for this description. >Where can I find more detailed documentation? On my harddisk :-). Right now there isn't very much documentation about this stuff. The text I posted last night was taken from a documentation that I'll commit soon. >MJ> According to this rule I don't know anymore if Image_Common >MJ> is an appropriate name for it. Perhaps Image_GDConvert would >MJ> be better since converting images (that's the purpose of your >MJ> class, isn't it?) isn't what I would call common image operations. > >From my point of view, "common image operations" is: >1) read image from database or file to binary string, >2) perform some operations, and 3) print it to browser or file >Image_Common will help in 1 and 3 +1 >And I think, Image_Common look better than Image_GDConvert But converting images aren't common image operations. They are much more than reading images from a source and outputting it. So my vote is for Image_Convert or ImageGDConvert. - Martin