Re: please vote - package-proposal Payment_IBAN

On Wednesday, August 6, 2003 23:56, Christian Stocker wrote: > On 8/6/03 11:49 PM, Markus Wolff wrote: >> Stefan Neufeind wrote: >> >> From what you describe, I think "Validate" might indeed be misleading - >> but "Payment" is misleading as well, as until now there are only classes >> in there that are related to actually performing payments through >> payment gateways, while your IBAN package doesn´t _perform_ any payments >> by itself. > are there packages on PEAR which perform payments by itself, without > bothering me and especially my account? cool ;) >> An appropriate category might be "Banking", which doesn´t exist... well, >> in other words, I have no idea where to put this ;-) > What about Finance_ ? Banking is somehow limiting again. For me, Validate is not really the place for this class. I'm +1 for Finance_IBAN, but I'm also +1 for Payment. It perhaps doesn't "pays" but it's indeed related to payments. For integrating into Validate, just setting an interface method to IBAN::validate() and adding an optional dependecy in Validate would do the trick. -- Tomas V.V.Cox mailto:cox@idecnet.com