Re: AW: [PEAR-DEV] About the package proposal interface

On Sun, 17 Aug 2003, Stephan Schmidt wrote: > > The whole voting session for Stream_Var took one afternoon, > > that's not enough if you really want to review the code and > > not only vote for the idea like some did (see the mail archive). > The voting session took about 24 hours that's more than some other > packages had. Because it was done before, it doesn't mean that it is a good idea. If I would have jumped into a ditch, would you do that to? > Som people also reviewed the code and I can assure you that the code is > OK, it's not the first package I released in PEAR and I worked on > several other open source projects. Nobody is saying something against this. Don't see this personally, because it's rather a problem in the proposal system. > > Also, when people like Wez and Derick vote -1, I think it > > might be useful to take a bit more time before committing the > > package. I am not sure those -1 were counted in the final count. < > First, they did not vote -1, Wez voted -0 (whatever he wanted to say > with this) and Derrick sees no use for this package. I did mean -1. (And my name is with one 'r'). Derick -- "Interpreting what the GPL actually means is a job best left to those that read the future by examining animal entrails." ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Derick Rethans http://derickrethans.nl/ International PHP Magazine http://php-mag.net/ -------------------------------------------------------------------------