Re: Re: About the package proposal interface
| From: | Martin Jansen | Date: | Sun, 17 Aug 2003 18:43:34 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: Re: About the package proposal interface | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 | Groups: | php.pear.dev |
| Request: | Send a blank email to pear-dev+get-19944@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
On Sun Aug 17, 2003 at 01:3616PM +0100, David Grant wrote:
> I haven't been around the PEAR community very long, and I know you have, so
> you can disregard my opinion if you choose, but shouldn't PEAR be a home for
> any package that provides an easier way to carry out a specific task?
So you think that the packages proposed in
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=pear-dev&m=105986336428703&w=2
should be
part of PEAR?
> Quality?
> Administration? Surely with a rock solid QA
Having a QA initiative is a more than tricky task. (The best example is
the PHP QA team.) Thus we shouldn't rely too much on it.
>(volunteer here)
Join pear-qa@lists.php.net and announce your intention there. I guess
the QA folks are happy about every help they can get.
--
- Martin Martin Jansen
http://martinjansen.com/