Re: Re: About the package proposal interface

On 17 Aug 2003 at 14:45, David Grant wrote: > On Sunday 17 August 2003 14:34, Pierre-Alain Joye wrote: > > Both, reject packages and create a QA team. But that's my > > humble opinion. > > I'm assuming that all packages submitted would be useful (if only to a > small group). Does your opinion still hold in this situation? If so, > what would be the criteria for acceptance, rejection? I clearly would like to stress that "a small group" is not to be confused with "a minority" or "nobody" - since then we wouldn't need the packages, that's right. But I guess thinking of PEAR as the "enterprise grade repository" it's also okay to have Net_Gopher (if it was works correctly and is still maintained) to complete the repository - even though gopher nowadays is not that widely used (anymore). In my opinion this is not the point. Stefan