Re: Re: Packaging
| From: | Stefan Neufeind | Date: | Tue, 19 Aug 2003 21:44:57 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: Re: Packaging | ||
| References: | 1 | Groups: | php.pear.dev |
| Request: | Send a blank email to pear-dev+get-20105@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
On 19 Aug 2003 at 17:04, Greg Beaver wrote:
> I'd consider using this structure:
>
> File/Ogg.php
> File/Ogg/PEAR.php
> File/Ogg/PECL.php
> File/Ogg/Vorbis/PEAR.php
> etc.
>
> Others can comment on the choice of names, I wonder if PEAR should
> instead be PHP, to describe the difference that it's coded in PHP, and
> the other is a wrapper? maybe PEAR.php and PECLwrapper.php?
I think calling it PEAR and PECL is fine. The structure seems okay
for me.
Stefan
> David Grant wrote:
>
> > Hi List,
> >
> > I want to package a file for File_Ogg, and I have the following
> > files:
> >
> > File_Ogg.php
> > File_Ogg_PEAR.php
> > File_Ogg_PECL.php
> > File_Ogg_Vorbis_PEAR.php
> > File_Ogg_Vorbis_PECL.php
> >
> > How should I structure the directories?
> >
> > I would've thought it was logical to put File_Ogg.php into File/,
> > but what about the PEAR and PECL extensions? Everything else would
> > be put into File/Ogg/ (I guess). Is this correct?
> >
> > Regards,
> >
> > David
> >
>
>
> --
> PEAR Development Mailing List (http://pear.php.net/)
> To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
>