Re: Re: Packaging
| From: | David Grant | Date: | Tue, 19 Aug 2003 21:11:18 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: Re: Packaging | ||
| References: | 1 2 | Groups: | php.pear.dev |
| Request: | Send a blank email to pear-dev+get-20103@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
On Tuesday 19 August 2003 22:04, Greg Beaver wrote:
> Hi David,
>
> I'd consider using this structure:
>
> File/Ogg.php
> File/Ogg/PEAR.php
> File/Ogg/PECL.php
> File/Ogg/Vorbis/PEAR.php
> etc.
>
> Others can comment on the choice of names, I wonder if PEAR should
> instead be PHP, to describe the difference that it's coded in PHP, and
> the other is a wrapper?
> maybe PEAR.php and PECLwrapper.php?
I don't mind how it looks, only how it works. I chose PEAR and PECL
<sad>because they're the same length</sad>. Surely a file called
(PEAR|PECL|PHP|Whatever).php, is extremely confusing (which is why I didn't
suggest it)?
Regards,
David