Re: Re: Packaging
| From: | David Grant | Date: | Tue, 19 Aug 2003 22:12:03 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: Re: Packaging | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 | Groups: | php.pear.dev |
| Request: | Send a blank email to pear-dev+get-20109@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
On Tuesday 19 August 2003 22:19, Greg Beaver wrote:
> David Grant wrote:
> >I don't mind how it looks, only how it works. I chose PEAR and PECL
> ><sad>because they're the same length</sad>. Surely a file called
> >(PEAR|PECL|PHP|Whatever).php, is extremely confusing (which is why I
> > didn't suggest it)?
>
> It might be, but in the context of the require_once statement, I don't
> think so:
>
> require_once 'File/Ogg/PEAR.php';
>
> You could also use File/Ogg.php, and File/PECLWrapper/Ogg.php, which
> might make more sense - then you remove PEAR/PECL from the filename
Cool. That it will be then. :)
> I must admit that reads to me like caveman speak, "File Ogg PEAR" ;).
> The question is who is File, and is it painful to be Ogged? I remember
> from my days of playing netrek at school that ogging was quite a painful
> experience for opponents :)
FYI: The Ogg media project took it's name from that very term. :)
Cheers,
Dave