Re: Enforce CVS usage for packages / UDDI removal - was Re: [PEAR-DEV] #25151 [Opn->Fbk]: undefined function in UDDI

<alan@akbkhome.com> wrote : > Its been suggested that we enforce that all packages have a CVS > somewhere, before they are released. > > whether this CVS is sourceforge, horde, pear or a personal site.. is not > important.. - It would make bugfixing alot simpler.. - how can it be > 'fixed in CVS' when it's not there... I agree, having to install a package in order to review the code is a pain in the back and won't help improve its quality or find the bugs. > On a side issue - I just looked through UDDI - see the other message, > and I would seriously suggest removing it. - It looks like a handcoded > SOAP call, that could be done in < 5 lines of code... I agree again. Looks like Lukas Smith, Stefan Neufiend and Hartmut Holzgraefe voted +1. That's only 3 votes, it should never have been accepted. This package is just a hack. Hopefully, when we will have the new package proposal interface, things like that won't happen as often (another example is Stream_Var). Bertrand Mansion Mamasam