AW: AW: [PEAR-DEV] Enforce CVS usage for packages / UDDI removal -was Re: [PEAR-DEV] #25151 [Opn->Fbk]: undefined function in UDDI

From: Date: Wed, 20 Aug 2003 08:53:46 +0000
Subject: AW: AW: [PEAR-DEV] Enforce CVS usage for packages / UDDI removal -was Re: [PEAR-DEV] #25151 [Opn->Fbk]: undefined function in UDDI
References: 1  Groups: php.pear.dev 
Request: Send a blank email to pear-dev+get-20131@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message
Hi, How often do we have to discuss this? There has been one one -0 from Wez and your "Cool feature but I don't need this". So there was no formal -1 on this package. I admitt that there could have been some -1s if I had waited a week, but there could also have been some +1s or even the end of the world. Nobody knows for sure. I already said, that we should include a statement on minumum voting time on pearweb, as currently nobody knows how log you should wait until you release a packge. Stephan > -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- > Von: Derick Rethans [mailto:derick@php.net] > Gesendet: Mittwoch, 20. August 2003 10:39 > An: Stephan Schmidt > Cc: pear-dev@lists.php.net > Betreff: Re: AW: [PEAR-DEV] Enforce CVS usage for packages / UDDI > removal -was Re: [PEAR-DEV] #25151 [Opn->Fbk]: undefined function in > UDDI > > > On Wed, 20 Aug 2003, Stephan Schmidt wrote: > > > I agree with you in most points, except that this is totally > different to > > Stream_Var: > > > > 1. Stream_Var got 6 +1s > > But also quite a lot of -1's... don't they count? > > Derick > > -- > "Interpreting what the GPL actually means is a job best left to those > that read the future by examining animal entrails." > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > Derick Rethans > http://derickrethans.nl/ > International PHP Magazine > http://php-mag.net/ > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > >

« previous php.pear.dev (#20131) next »