AW: AW: [PEAR-DEV] Enforce CVS usage for packages / UDDI removal -was Re: [PEAR-DEV] #25151 [Opn->Fbk]: undefined function in UDDI
| From: | Stephan Schmidt | Date: | Wed, 20 Aug 2003 08:53:46 +0000 |
| Subject: | AW: AW: [PEAR-DEV] Enforce CVS usage for packages / UDDI removal -was Re: [PEAR-DEV] #25151 [Opn->Fbk]: undefined function in UDDI | ||
| References: | 1 | Groups: | php.pear.dev |
| Request: | Send a blank email to pear-dev+get-20131@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
Hi,
How often do we have to discuss this?
There has been one one -0 from Wez and your "Cool feature but I don't need
this". So there was no formal -1 on this package. I admitt that there could
have been some -1s if I had waited a week, but there could also have been
some +1s or even the end of the world. Nobody knows for sure.
I already said, that we should include a statement on minumum voting time on
pearweb, as currently nobody knows how log you should wait until you release
a packge.
Stephan
> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
> Von: Derick Rethans [mailto:derick@php.net]
> Gesendet: Mittwoch, 20. August 2003 10:39
> An: Stephan Schmidt
> Cc: pear-dev@lists.php.net
> Betreff: Re: AW: [PEAR-DEV] Enforce CVS usage for packages / UDDI
> removal -was Re: [PEAR-DEV] #25151 [Opn->Fbk]: undefined function in
> UDDI
>
>
> On Wed, 20 Aug 2003, Stephan Schmidt wrote:
>
> > I agree with you in most points, except that this is totally
> different to
> > Stream_Var:
> >
> > 1. Stream_Var got 6 +1s
>
> But also quite a lot of -1's... don't they count?
>
> Derick
>
> --
> "Interpreting what the GPL actually means is a job best left to those
> that read the future by examining animal entrails."
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Derick Rethans
> http://derickrethans.nl/
> International PHP Magazine
> http://php-mag.net/
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>