Re: Two PECL Proposals [linux_oss] and [oggvorbis]
| From: | David Grant | Date: | Tue, 09 Sep 2003 22:47:16 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: Two PECL Proposals [linux_oss] and [oggvorbis] | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 | Groups: | php.pear.dev |
| Request: | Send a blank email to pear-dev+get-21305@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
Hi Sara,
On Tue, 2003-09-09 at 22:41, Sara Golemon wrote:
> > > 2) oggvorbis
> > > http://frankenbox.alphaweb.net/test/oggvorbis-0.1.tgz
> >
> > If you're feeling handy with libvorbis, might I tempt you to contribute
> > to File_Ogg? File_Ogg is currently written in native PHP, but one of the
> > design goals is to enable use of a PECL extension. The package lives
> > here:
> >
> > http://pear.php.net/package/File_Ogg
> >
> I actually gave that some thought while I was working on this module, though
> I only looked far enough into your class to see that it focused on the
> header data with no means to extract the audio samples. I didn't notice
> that you'd planned on having a PECL package to do....well.... just what mine
> does...
I didn't plan on having a PECL package to do what your does -- the point
of File_Ogg and its extending packages for streams such as Vorbis is to
extract header data. I was hoping to use a PECL package to extract and
make available the same data. My question was simply to ask if your
package could be "adapted" to the same goal.
> My question to you at this point then, is what do you know of C? Were you
> thinking of helping with the maintenance of the PECL end of this? Or just
> focusing on the PEAR development?
I cannot code in C. Hell, I can barely code in PHP! To answer you
question, I was not intending to help maintain the PECL code, but I
guess I could use this as an excuse to learn C.
> In either event, I've gotten enough positive responses, I'm going to go
> ahead and upload oggvorbis for now, with linux_oss waiting in the wings
> (possibly to die there) while I look into libsdl.
Good luck!
Regards,
David