Re: XML_Parser/XML_Tree bugs/problems, post them here please

On Wednesday, September 10, 2003 1:56, Alan Knowles wrote: > Tomas V.V.Cox wrote: >>On Monday, September 8, 2003 9:56, Alan Knowles wrote: >> >> >> >>>http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=pear-dev&m=106023283515443&w=2 >>> >>> >> >> >> >>>callbacks would be really nice.. >>>I originally did id building & parent/searching in a util class - it >>>may be better to keep it that way... >>> >>> >> >>Doesn't XML_Transformer do that? >> > callbacks - Yes, kind of, although > a) it was a very small change to implement > b) it's alot simpler than xml transformer on non-namespaced > transformations (eg. lightweight). > c) you dont have to subclass to implement it.. > d) AFAIR xml tranformer focuses on returning a test string, where as > this focusing on returning an array / or object tree.. I guess this would bloat a little the class, but looks like a nice addition. What about creating a new file with a class extended of XML_Tree which provides that (if possible)? Would be nice if you could provide me it and a usage example, I'd include both in the package. -- Tomas V.V.Cox mailto:cox@idecnet.com