Re: Proposal: File_Apache
| From: | Michael Wallner | Date: | Fri, 12 Sep 2003 14:14:20 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: Proposal: File_Apache | ||
| References: | 1 2 | Groups: | php.pear.dev |
| Request: | Send a blank email to pear-dev+get-21432@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Hi Mika Tuupola, you wrote:
>> +- HtAccess.php - operates on .htaccess files
>> +- HtPasswd.php - operates on .htpasswd files
>> +- HtGroup.php - operates on .htgroup files
> Usage of these files are not limited to Apache
> web server. Thus naming it File_Apache might not
> be appropriate.
Hm? I think I'm missin' sth...
> This looks fine. It could be included in PEAR as
> File_HtGroup. What I would do is to change some
> method names to be similar with File_HtAccess.
> For example parse() -> load() and commit() -> save().
If that becomes the way to go I would be happy to provide
File_HtGroup.
BTW: I found a type in this class, files are updated.
> File_Passwd already does this and it does not need
> the htpasswd binary.
I'm sorry, I didn't have it locally, but viewing it know I have
to say, that it only supports crypt() which is not available for
Apache under Win32.
> There already is File_HtAccess. However I like the extra
> functionality your version has. Some of it could (should :)
> be included in the current File_HtAccess?
>
I'm happy to hear that from der lead-dev, perhaps we can find
some consense :)
Michael
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (Cygwin)
iD8DBQE/YdS83645gzRPvy8RAmJtAJ40fr9TFPblMBGL9/1wMqBnMihogACeIAz5
AY5YhoOiQHhPdj5S6BqqCV0=
=3syM
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----