Re: Proposal: File_Apache

From: Date: Fri, 12 Sep 2003 15:09:48 +0000
Subject: Re: Proposal: File_Apache
References: 1 2  Groups: php.pear.dev 
Request: Send a blank email to pear-dev+get-21440@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi Mika Tuupola, you wrote: > Apache is not the only webserver which uses .htaccess > and friends. Atleast NCSA httpd and probably other > use them. Thus naming them after apache is > not appropriate. Hm, I see... I thought NCSA is kind of "dead" yet, and others are also minor, so this feature "belongs" somehow to Apache software and I concluded File_Apache would be the best name, but ATM it looks more like the features will be implemented in other packages, so discussion about the name will probably just waste time - as I said ATM :) waiting for other comments, too ;-) > Great. We still need to hear what others think. Of course. If it comes to File_HtGroup naming would be adopted. > Maybe File_Passwd should be improved? Must say I am not > too familiar with PHP in Windows. Yes, however, keep in mind it depends upon Apache's implementation not PHP's. Michael -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (Cygwin) iD8DBQE/YeG83645gzRPvy8RAvlfAJ4kbg0fcZ2gl7L5Ngaimw+/WuuKGACfW5NB PCdtVZJapIEIY4xsKSPbt1s= =O187 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

« previous php.pear.dev (#21440) next »