Re: Proposal: File_Apache

From: Date: Fri, 12 Sep 2003 18:50:06 +0000
Subject: Re: Proposal: File_Apache
References: 1  Groups: php.pear.dev 
Request: Send a blank email to pear-dev+get-21448@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi, just making a first small summary: Mika Tuupola: o no extra package File_Apache o implement some features into original File_HtAccess o improve File_Passwd o introduce File_HtGroup Marshall Roch: o modularization of HtAccess + HtAccess + HtAccess_Auth + HtAccess_Rewrite + HtAccess_... I'm basically not against not making an extra package, if most people think that it would not be a good idea to introduce File_Apache on its own. *If so, I would suggest the following*: Mika has already agreed to review my code over the weekend for checking how to merge our both HtAccess classes the best way. I don't know if splitting HtAccess into many modules is the best way. Even though it's a big file, it's not as huge as others and the API is straight and comprehensive, so what do you guys think about that? Introduce package File_HtGroup. Introduce package File_HtPasswd, because I think separating classes for different purposes is not a /that bad/ idea, btw there is also a package called File_SMBPasswd. Adapt the API of File_HtGroup and File_HtPasswd to the current commonly used methods load() and save(). Michael -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (Cygwin) iD8DBQE/YhVe3645gzRPvy8RArCEAJ9P7XuXa6l3RvK4Az14FtHV+z8NRQCeJIvI gzbRF5ErIePa8K415rZbK1Q= =k4YP -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

« previous php.pear.dev (#21448) next »