Re: DB_ldap2 still maintained?
| From: | Piotr Roszatycki | Date: | Wed, 17 Sep 2003 16:40:10 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: DB_ldap2 still maintained? | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 4 5 | Groups: | php.pear.dev |
| Request: | Send a blank email to pear-dev+get-21646@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
Wolfram Kriesing wrote:
Piotr Roszatycki wrote:They were based on DB_ldap which was LGPL library. I think GPL is not PEAR compatible and LGPL should be. Am I right? -- Piotr Roszatycki, Netia Telekom S.A. .''`. mailto:Piotr_Roszatycki@netia.net.pl : :' : mailto:dexter@debian.orgWolfram Kriesing wrote:ok, i will do so. thanks for answering. just another thing ... the classes are published under LGPL, isnt this PEAR-incompatible?Wolfram Kriesing wrote:I was very busy last time. Just fill the bug report and attach the patches. If you have access to CVS then apply the patches if they doesn't break anything and be sure it is backward compatible with old libraries. I use DB_ldap2 with DB 1.3. I don't like to upgrade all PEAR libraries.is the package DB_ldap2 still being maintained? i tried to use it but at least simpleQuery() seems not to work properly, and it throws a lot of notices ... is someone on it?there is no answer ... So i just got another simple question how is the default policy for modifying someone else's package. I only have cleaning up issues for DB_ldap2 to work properly, solve CS-issues and prevent warnings. Where do i get "official" permission to commit changes?
. '
`-