Re: Re: [RfC] XML_Beautifier
| From: | Stefan Neufeind | Date: | Sat, 20 Sep 2003 08:36:41 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: Re: [RfC] XML_Beautifier | ||
| References: | 1 | Groups: | php.pear.dev |
| Request: | Send a blank email to pear-dev+get-21831@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
On 20 Sep 2003 at 10:32, Martin Jansen wrote:
> On Sat Sep 20, 2003 at 10:2231AM +0200, Stefan Neufeind wrote:
> > I guess apiVersion 2.0 will be our Foo2 soon, right?
>
> I did not catch up with the recent discussion on versioning/BC stuff,
> but if you guys are planning to rename a package when releasing a new
> major version, that's a bad thing and I'm strongly against that.
Hmm, then you missed a lot of good points for this renaming also :-))
Maybe have a look at the archives. One main reason for me renaming
the packages and classes is that this is the only way you can use two
or more packages in one app where one uses v1.x e.g. of MDB and the
other v2.x. Otherwise require_once on v1.x and another require_once
on v2.x but keeping the classnames you could run into bad collisions
... and nothing would work anymore.
Think it over again - and if you have a good suggestion to the
problem surely you're welcome to contribute your thoughts.
Stefan