Re: Dependencie error installing DataObjects
| From: | rocha at i-node dot com dot br | Date: | Wed, 01 Oct 2003 02:07:28 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: Dependencie error installing DataObjects | ||
| Groups: | php.pear.dev | ||
| Request: | Send a blank email to pear-dev+get-22246@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
Citando Alexey Borzov <borz_off@cs.msu.su>:
> If you look at DataObject's package.xml in CVS, Validate is marked as an
> optional dependency. This is related to the bug in PEAR packager:
> http://pear.php.net/bugs/bug.php?id=14
Thanxs Alexey. But i already guess that if i spent sometime searching cvs,
the website or google, i could have found the answer...as i did after sent the
e-mail. That is not my point. My concern is about quality.
Lets frase it another way:
A stable package can use unstable ones? Even optionally?
The fact that the option was not an option on the DataObject case I understand
now was a bug on the packager. But I think it should be a policy of the
repository do not allow that happen, dont you? That odd/even branchs used
on versions of linux kernels is a good tool to handle that. And the next time
someone broke the packager we dont got alpha packages on a stable installation.
Just my 2 cents QA question..
Regards
S.Rocha
>
>
>
-------------------------------------------------
This mail sent through IMP: http://horde.org/imp/