Re: Fix this FAQ ! (was: [PEAR-BUG] Bug #923)

On Sun, 29 Feb 2004 16:30:33 -0500 "Richard York" <richy@smilingsouls.net> wrote: > Indeed it is a _recommendation_. Nope, this is not a recommandation. This is the package directory structure to be used in pear, including your new packages. That said, I agree that these docs may be more visible inside the manual. > As I already said, I will not change anything until I see it in the > official docs. Perhaps you perceive this as being unreasonable, > but I **don't like** the suggestion, I think it confuses things and > I don't care how many packages do it that way. I think its utterly > stupid to have individual directories for every category and then > place the documentation > in an outside directory that recreates > directories for each package. The examples belong where the > package file is. > This is confusing, it isn't user-friendly, and I'm not doing it. This has been announced and published. It is not silly and you better have to do it. If you miss the concept behind this structure, feel free to check peardev archives or ask. hth pierre