RE: [PEAR-DEV] Fix this FAQ ! (was: [PEAR-BUG] Bug #923)

>This is also true, however, I don't think anyone is trying to step on >toes. There are indeed problems with the documentation of PEAR, and >this is frustrating for new PEAR coders. At the same time, seasoned >coders like Bertrand only wish to help improve the newer packages. We >must always remember, it takes effort and time to make a suggestion for >improvement, and even if it occasionally feels awful to receive these >suggestions, we must treat these suggestions with some respect. Flames >belong in the fireplace, not in the mouth. True enough. And again, my apologies Bertrand. I underestimated your intentions there and I certainly meant no disrespect. I'm sure I must have come off as scathing. (It's the cold that I've had for two weeks now!) I am by no means seasoned with PEAR.. as I mentioned in another thread I am both new to it as a user and as a developer on top of this being my first software released publicly. Some things have been very frustrating. And I certainly shouldn't be biting at hands trying to help! All that said.. yeah the lack of docs and the somewhat maize-like design of the doc navigation could use some love. I am not without the ability to compromise, I just mentioned where the examples are in my class docs (easy enough right?). My thanks to everyone out there setting me straight! Regards, Richard York