RE: Fix this FAQ ! (was: [PEAR-BUG] Bug #923)

From: Date: Tue, 02 Mar 2004 08:28:38 +0000
Subject: RE: Fix this FAQ ! (was: [PEAR-BUG] Bug #923)
References: 1  Groups: php.pear.dev php.pear.qa 
Request: Send a blank email to pear-dev+get-26027@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message
On 29 Feb 2004 at 17:04, Richard York wrote: > >Nope, this is not a recommandation. This is the package directory > >structure to be used in pear, including your >new packages. > > >That said, I agree that these docs may be more visible inside the > >manual. > > >This has been announced and published. It is not silly and you > >better have to do it. If you miss the concept behind this structure, > >feel free to check peardev archives or ask. > > I said I'd do it if it were in the docs, it is, and I have. > Sorry if my protest offends anyone, I just don't like the idea. > And I hope ya'll don't take me the wrong way, I'm just speaking my > mind : ) and this certainly isn't meant as anything personal against > Bertrand or anyone else. Its the idea I'm against, which has nothing > to do with the messenger. > > I fixed this and have replaced Mail_IMAP 0.1.7 with one that does it > that way. To bring this finally to an end: If you have a look at http://pear.php.net/manual/en/developers.packagedef.php you will see that I already adjusted the example we were talking about in the docs. So now Richard can clearly see how the official way goes :-)) PS: Let's stop this now and get back to more important things. Rules are there to be followed --- over and out! Stefan

« previous php.pear.dev (#26027) next »