RE: Fix this FAQ ! (was: [PEAR-BUG] Bug #923)
| From: | Stefan Neufeind | Date: | Tue, 02 Mar 2004 08:28:38 +0000 |
| Subject: | RE: Fix this FAQ ! (was: [PEAR-BUG] Bug #923) | ||
| References: | 1 | Groups: | php.pear.dev php.pear.qa |
| Request: | Send a blank email to pear-dev+get-26027@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
On 29 Feb 2004 at 17:04, Richard York wrote:
> >Nope, this is not a recommandation. This is the package directory
> >structure to be used in pear, including your >new packages.
>
> >That said, I agree that these docs may be more visible inside the
> >manual.
>
> >This has been announced and published. It is not silly and you
> >better have to do it. If you miss the concept behind this structure,
> >feel free to check peardev archives or ask.
>
> I said I'd do it if it were in the docs, it is, and I have.
> Sorry if my protest offends anyone, I just don't like the idea.
> And I hope ya'll don't take me the wrong way, I'm just speaking my
> mind : ) and this certainly isn't meant as anything personal against
> Bertrand or anyone else. Its the idea I'm against, which has nothing
> to do with the messenger.
>
> I fixed this and have replaced Mail_IMAP 0.1.7 with one that does it
> that way.
To bring this finally to an end: If you have a look at
http://pear.php.net/manual/en/developers.packagedef.php
you will see that I already adjusted the example we were talking
about in the docs. So now Richard can clearly see how the official
way goes :-))
PS: Let's stop this now and get back to more important things. Rules
are there to be followed --- over and out!
Stefan