Re: Ghost packages in PEAR
| From: | Bertrand Mansion | Date: | Fri, 16 Apr 2004 12:13:55 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: Ghost packages in PEAR | ||
| References: | 1 | Groups: | php.pear.dev |
| Request: | Send a blank email to pear-dev+get-27770@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
<smith@backendmedia.com> wrote :
> Bertrand Mansion wrote:
>
>> <borz_off@cs.msu.su> wrote :
>>
>>
>>> Hi!
>>>
>>> I decided to check the relation of PEAR CVS to actual packages published
>>> via PEAR website. Got some interesting results.
>>>
>>> Ghost packages (exist in CVS but not on website)
>>>
>>> * Search_Mnogosearch
>>
>>
>> My fault. Mnogosearch extension API and parameters have changed too much
>> recently, so this package is mostly out of date now.
>>
>> I keep on using it as a reference to get more information on the way
>> parameters are given to mnogosearch functions. Mnogosearch documentation
>> being very out of date on the PHP website and the PHP frontend code in
>> Mnogosearch being very cryptic and unreadable, my code can help understand
>> better a few things on how to use Mnogosearch with PHP in a more OO manner.
>>
>> I guess it can be removed if some one wants to remove it. Or even, it could
>> be reworked if someone is motivated. Today, I would do it differently and
>> use an Agent and a result objects.
>
> I dont think we should really remove code. I can see us moving code if
> we have a name clash. However it might be a good idea to add a little
> explanation to CVS in a READMEFIRST file .. or DEPRECATED or whatever.
OK, I'll do that ASAP.
Bertrand Mansion
Mamasam