Re: PEAR Account Request: renzo
| From: | Pierre-Alain Joye | Date: | Sat, 17 Apr 2004 21:19:04 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: PEAR Account Request: renzo | ||
| References: | 1 2 | Groups: | php.pear.dev |
| Request: | Send a blank email to pear-dev+get-27886@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
On Sat, 17 Apr 2004 22:56:26 +0200
klaus@capitalfocus.org (Klaus Guenther) wrote:
> I'm very much for implementing the additional application form
> questions as suggested in the lanceromance request thread. Anyone
> with a legitimate reason will still get through. And few others.
>
> Of course, we do have to be careful not to raise the bar so high
> that people with legitimate reasons have undue difficulties. For
> example, any boxes that need to be unchecked should be OK checked
> if someone gives a legitimate reason (e.g., package submission
> with description, etc.).
People asked for transparency, transparency sometimes means noises.
Noises, in this case, is solved with 2 clicks. At least for the
noise that came from the account requests... So if you have times to
spend on that, please do. But there is far better things to do with
free time ;-)
Besides the fact that you will still get silly requests :-)
regards,
pierre