Re: PEAR Account Request: renzo
| From: | Jon Parise | Date: | Sun, 18 Apr 2004 23:17:09 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: PEAR Account Request: renzo | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 | Groups: | php.pear.dev |
| Request: | Send a blank email to pear-dev+get-27960@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
On Sun, Apr 18, 2004 at 01:01:16PM -0700, Ian Eure wrote:
[I don't mean to single you out specifically, Ian. Yours is just the
most recent message in this thread.]
> On Saturday 17 April 2004 01:56 pm, Klaus Guenther wrote:
> > Renzo Bonfranchi <renzo@bonfranchi.com> wrote:
> > > Requested from: 217.162.23.232
> > > Username: renzo
> > > Real Name: Renzo Bonfranchi
> > > Email: renzo@bonfranchi.com (show address)
> > > Purpose:
> > > Problems
> > >
> > > To handle: http://pear.php.net/admin/?acreq=renzo
> >
> > I'm very much for implementing the additional application form questions as
> > suggested in the lanceromance request thread. Anyone with a legitimate
> > reason will still get through. And few others.
> >
> > Of course, we do have to be careful not to raise the bar so high that
> > people with legitimate reasons have undue difficulties. For example, any
> > boxes that need to be unchecked should be OK checked if someone gives a
> > legitimate reason (e.g., package submission with description, etc.).
> >
> Perhaps a RE that rejects requests less than, say, 5 words?
At this point, those of you interested in improving the account
request system should check out the 'pearweb' source code and start
submitting patches using the bug tracker.
Remember, this is an open source project. Everyone is free to
contribute.
--
Jon Parise (jon@php.net) :: The PHP Project (http://www.php.net/)