Re: PEAR Account Request: schnirkel

> ok these features would require using the LiveUser Medium containter. > could you elaborate? well, i know LiveUser from reading the docs, both pear and LiveUser homepage docs, but I've not tried it yet in something bigger than my htdocs/test... . > The end result would be: > ...all without having to migrate any data from one > package to another. > However it just might be that with better documentation LiveUser can be > made easy enough (maybe with a few adjustments to our simple and/or > medium container) that we dont need a separate package. well, from this point of view i think it would be better to stay with LiveUser, and improve the documentation. cycling from LiveUser simple through medium to complex is easier and faster then changing from basic package Auth, to a new package "GroupAuth" and finally to LiveUser. So I'll try to use LiveUser and maybe come up with some suggestions for an easy "group api" ?! bye, thomas lutz -- NEU : GMX Internet.FreeDSL Ab sofort DSL-Tarif ohne Grundgebühr: http://www.gmx.net/info