Re: PEAR Account Request: schnirkel
| From: | Lukas Smith | Date: | Mon, 19 Apr 2004 09:30:04 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: PEAR Account Request: schnirkel | ||
| References: | 1 2 | Groups: | php.pear.dev |
| Request: | Send a blank email to pear-dev+get-27996@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
Thomas Lutz wrote:
thats sounds awesome to me .. I will be giving a talk on LiveUser and I will also write an article for the PHP Mag on LiveUser in May. Therefore I will spend sometime on this. Atleast the slides from the talk will be public .. the mag article will take some time before they will publish it and they claim exclusive rights to the content obviously. But aside from that there is the start provided by Arnaud in terms of a tutorial an all the LiveUser devs who really need to address the docs issue. Maybe with your help we can lift our asses up and get going on docs! regards, Lukas Smith smith@backendmedia.com _______________________________ BackendMedia www.backendmedia.com berlin@backendmedia.com Linn Zwoch Smith GbR Pariser Str. 44 D-10707 Berlin Tel +49 30 83 22 50 00 Fax +49 30 83 22 50 07The end result would be: ...all without having to migrate any data from one package to another. However it just might be that with better documentation LiveUser can be made easy enough (maybe with a few adjustments to our simple and/or medium container) that we dont need a separate package.well, from this point of view i think it would be better to stay with LiveUser, and improve the documentation. cycling from LiveUser simple through medium to complex is easier and faster then changing from basic package Auth, to a new package "GroupAuth" and finally to LiveUser. So I'll try to use LiveUser and maybe come up with some suggestions for an easy "group api" ?!