Re: Portscanner class
| From: | Joao Prado Maia | Date: | Thu, 15 Nov 2001 21:24:47 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: Portscanner class | ||
| References: | 1 | Groups: | php.pear.dev |
| Request: | Send a blank email to pear-dev+get-2909@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
On Thu, 15 Nov 2001, Martin Jansen wrote:
> On Thu, 15 Nov 2001 19:21:47 +0100, Martin Jansen wrote:
>
> >I've adapted a portscanner class of mine to the PEAR standards and
> >I'll commit it to CVS if noone objects. Is this ok or do you think
> >it won't fit in PEAR?
>
> Since noone objected, I commited it :-). Have a look at
> /pear/Net_Portscan for the code. Documentation can be found
> at http://pear.php.net/manual/.
>
I didn't actually know that there was a '/manual' on pear.php.net, but I
guess it is a nice effort. At first I thought it was yet another
repository 'peardoc' for the translations of the PEAR manual, but I can
see that it is still being manually edited on PHP sources.
Now, looking at the current 'PEAR manual' I got a little doubt. Are we
going to document _all_ PEAR classes on the PEAR manual ? Or just the ones
that are contained on the PEAR Foundation Classes (as described by Stig or
Chuck) ?
Maybe I missed the discussion on this subject, so bear with me.
Joao
--
João Prado Maia <jpm@phpbrasil.com>
http://phpbrasil.com - php com um jeitinho brasileiro
--
Precisando de consultoria em desenvolvimento para a Internet ?
Impleo.net - http://impleo.net/?lang=br