Re: Portscanner class

On Fri, 16 Nov 2001, Martin Jansen wrote: > >Now, looking at the current 'PEAR manual' I got a little doubt. Are we > >going to document _all_ PEAR classes on the PEAR manual ? > > It think, all elements of PEAR should be documented, no? > Well, I guess the real question is rather if _all_ PEAR classes will be documented and stored on '/manual'. Right now is not much of an issue, but what about in 2 years from now ? And aren't we thinking on relaxing more on the requirements for new classes / packages to be included in PEAR ? This would mean a lot more stuff in the 'manual'. Yet another question is related to the classes that are not mantained on the php.net CVS server, but stored on the upcoming pear.php.net repository. Would all of those classes / packages have to be on the manual ? Just imagine if CPAN had a manual for the documentation of _all_ its packages. I don't like that idea too much. Maybe having a special place on the pear.php.net repository to store the documentation of the package and leave the 'manual' for the PEAR Foundation classes only ? Joao -- João Prado Maia <jpm@phpbrasil.com> http://phpbrasil.com - php com um jeitinho brasileiro -- Precisando de consultoria em desenvolvimento para a Internet ? Impleo.net - http://impleo.net/?lang=br