Re: Portscanner class

On Thu, 15 Nov 2001 16:24:47 -0500 (EST), Joao Prado Maia wrote: >On Thu, 15 Nov 2001, Martin Jansen wrote: > >> On Thu, 15 Nov 2001 19:21:47 +0100, Martin Jansen wrote: >> >> >I've adapted a portscanner class of mine to the PEAR standards and >> >I'll commit it to CVS if noone objects. Is this ok or do you think >> >it won't fit in PEAR? >> >> Since noone objected, I commited it :-). Have a look at >> /pear/Net_Portscan for the code. Documentation can be found >> at http://pear.php.net/manual/. >> > >I didn't actually know that there was a '/manual' on pear.php.net, but I >guess it is a nice effort. At first I thought it was yet another >repository 'peardoc' for the translations of the PEAR manual, but I can >see that it is still being manually edited on PHP sources. Right now there is no repository, but there will be one for sure. >Now, looking at the current 'PEAR manual' I got a little doubt. Are we >going to document _all_ PEAR classes on the PEAR manual ? It think, all elements of PEAR should be documented, no? >Or just the ones >that are contained on the PEAR Foundation Classes (as described by Stig or >Chuck) ? They should be documented on pear.php.net in _any_ case. - Martin