Re: PHP_Compat
| From: | Jan Lehnardt | Date: | Sun, 20 Jun 2004 10:19:38 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: PHP_Compat | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 | Groups: | php.pear.dev |
| Request: | Send a blank email to pear-dev+get-30948@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
On 20 Jun 2004, at 16:04, Tobias Schlitt wrote:
+1 for putting neat functions in a Utility package. (This is not a vote, I just state my opinion :) Jan - -- GPG Key: BB96 56B0 Q: Thank Jan? - A: http://geschenke.an.dasmoped.net/ -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (Darwin) iD8DBQFA1WS67KW8t7uWVrARAoIsAKDVeXYnC60McbTzgCwy6EgbCeYikACgh8Mw QwaXE5BSC/E0wLoQsB53738= =YxBC -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----As with in_iarray, I think it's probably best not to add this stuff. PHP_Compat should only aim to replicate new PHP components. I think a PHP_Utils class would be a good idea.Sounds good for me. @pear-dev: What do the others think?