Re: [PEPr] Comment on RFC::ProtectedMembers

On Sun Jun 27, 2004 at 12:0234PM -0500, Paul M Jones wrote: > I thought PEPr was the proper forum for such discussion and > decision-making, especially as regards the structure of PEAR itself > (such as coding standards). Anything done informally on the list is, > well, "informal" (isn't it?). > > Perhaps PEAR Group can clarify. It should be obvious that we are not disposed to start a PEPr voting for every single bit that requires a decision. But given the fact that people's opinions on this particular topic diverge so much, I believe that managing the decision in a PEPr-based process is the best way. -- - Martin Martin Jansen http://martinjansen.com/