Re: [PEPr] Comment on RFC::ProtectedMembers
| From: | Justin Patrin | Date: | Mon, 28 Jun 2004 16:38:28 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: [PEPr] Comment on RFC::ProtectedMembers | ||
| References: | 1 2 | Groups: | php.pear.dev |
| Request: | Send a blank email to pear-dev+get-31295@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
I will also vote for no prefix for *protected* vars, the lists have
convinced me.. But private vars should still IMHO be prefixed.
On Sun, 27 Jun 2004 23:36:17 +0200, Markus Wolff <wolff@21st.de> wrote:
>
> PEPr wrote:
> > The final vote was:
> >
> > 11 no prefix
> >
> > 9 for "_" prefix
>
> Make that 12 for no prefix and 9 for "_" prefix, as after reading
> through some (definitely not all, you guys are really nuts about this
> issue :-)) of the related posts, I change my vote in favor of no prefix.
>
> CU
> Markus
>
>
>
> --
> PEAR Development Mailing List (http://pear.php.net/)
> To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
>
>
--
paperCrane --Justin Patrin--